Rubio Embarks on Central America Tour with Immigration and Panama Canal at Forefront

Rubio Embarks on Central America Tour with Immigration and Panama Canal at Forefront

Publisher: Bouncer New | Author: Abdul Jabbar

Secretary of State Marco Rubio is going to embark on his first foreign travel this weekend as he heads for Central America with two themes firmly topping his agenda, including curbing illegal immigration and reasserting control for the United States at the Panama Canal, an action that has already drawn criticism from the region.

This was Central America for Rubio, which deviates from the norm set by previous U.S. secretaries of state when they opted to visit Europe or Asia first. It also represents a combination of personal affinity toward the region-the first Hispanic ever to serve in this position-and the strategy by the Trump administration to place the highest foreign policy priorities within the Western Hemisphere.

“It’s no coincidence that my first trip abroad as secretary of state will be within the hemisphere,” Rubio wrote in an op-ed published in The Wall Street Journal on Friday.

Among his agenda, mass migration and drug trafficking will take center stage for Rubio. Still, the visit also aims to challenge China’s growing presence in Latin America, especially with regard to infrastructure spending in areas surrounding the Panama Canal. The U.S. built the canal but relinquished it to Panama in 1999. Even with intense objections from Panamanian leaders, the Trump administration has been very vocal about retaking control of the critical trade artery.

Mass migration, drug smuggling, and the policies of nations such as Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela have created instability, Rubio wrote in his Journal piece. “At the same time, the Chinese Communist Party is using economic and diplomatic influence—especially at the Panama Canal—to undermine U.S. interests and turn sovereign nations into dependent states.”

His first destination on his five-nation tour is Panama, where President José Raúl Mulino has categorically rejected any idea of returning control of the canal to the United States. He says the discussions will be about issues of mutual concern, like migration and drug trafficking.

“The canal is Panamanian. There is no room for negotiation on this matter,” Mulino said on Thursday.

But on this, Rubio is undeterred. Speaking with SiriusXM’s Megyn Kelly, he reiterated that President Trump believes it’s a national security issue because of the increasing Chinese presence in the region. “The president has made it clear that he wants to oversee the canal once again. While the Panamanians are opposed, that stance won’t change our concerns,” Rubio said.

China’s influence over key port facilities at both ends of the canal has been a cause for concern in Washington because if Beijing were to decide to disrupt trade flows, then this would clearly breach the treaty signed in 1977 under which former President Jimmy Carter had agreed to hand over the Panama Canal.

Despite Mulino’s tough talk, analysts see potential for a settlement, at least regarding Hong Kong-based Hutchison Ports, to which was extended a 25-year concession on a no-bid basis. An audit on the legality of that extension has been ordered; rebidding then might let the concession fall to an American or European operator, but that likely would not fulfill Trump’s general demands.

Trump is applying pressure where there may already be an opening,” said Ryan Berg, director of the Americas Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C. “The real question is whether his administration is willing to accept a middle-ground solution or if full control is the ultimate goal.

He is scheduled to visit El Salvador, Costa Rica, Guatemala and the Dominican Republic following Panama as part of the trip. During his visit coincides with resumed U.S. visa processing, after a four-week suspension following a temporary blockade imposed by Colombia over the unwillingness of their government to allow deportation of national back to U.S. end.

Unlike previous secretaries of state who often travel with aid commitments and cooperation initiatives, Rubio’s trip is expected to feature limited new assistance. This is because of Trump’s freeze on foreign aid pending a review of all U.S. assistance programs. Although some critical humanitarian programs have been exempted, waivers for aid packages in Panama, Costa Rica, and the Dominican Republic are still under evaluation.

One notable exception is Haiti, where the State Department has already approved $41 million to support an international peacekeeping mission. Although Rubio will not be visiting Haiti, his discussions with regional leaders are expected to touch on broader U.S. efforts to maintain stability in the region.

Immigration, security, and geopolitical influence are all at stake in Rubio’s tour, which is a critical test for the Trump administration’s foreign policy in Latin America. The results of his negotiations, especially on the Panama Canal, will shape U.S.-Central America relations for years to come.

Hazardous Situations on Highway 1 Through Fraser Valley Prompt Temporary Closures

Hazardous Situations on Highway 1 Through Fraser Valley Prompt Temporary Closures

Bouncer News – B.C. highway officials are telling drivers to slow down and drive with extreme caution on Highway 1 through Langley and into the Fraser Valley, where the conditions are deemed hazardous enough that the highway will be temporarily shut down.

BC Highway Patrol Cpl. Michael McLaughlin said hazardous weather may cause authorities to close sections of the highway in both directions for safety reasons.

“The initial reports of icy conditions came from the stretch between 216th and 264th streets, but the risk extends along Highway 1 from Whistler to Hope,” McLaughlin noted.

Drivers are advised to avoid non-essential travel, leave earlier than usual for their trips, and make sure their vehicles are prepared for winter driving.

The low-pressure system located southwest of Vancouver Island has been driving this weather pattern, sending bands of snow spiraling across the South Coast, Global BC meteorologist Mark Madryga said.

The first flakes of snow appeared early on Saturday, and heavier snowfall developed overnight into Sunday, leaving more than 10 centimeters in some parts of the central Fraser Valley.

Another plus to watch for is that howling Arctic winds should continue to blow over the Fraser Valley, Howe Sound, and other coastal inlets until at least Monday and even into Tuesday, further badging driving dangers.

Motorists need to stay current on road conditions and be prepared for possible disruptions as winter weather persists in the region.

Publisher: Bouncer News
Author: Abdul Jabbar

https://theinscribermag.com/

Trump Tariffs Live Updates: 10 Percent Tariffs on China Take Hold as Beijing Detailed Plan for Reprisals

Published by Abdul Jabbar | Bouncer News

Feb. 4, 1:00 a.m. ESTPresident Donald Trump’s sweeping 10% tariffs on imports from China came into effect at midnight Tuesday, prompting retaliatory levies by Beijing. The Chinese government announced that starting February 10, additional tariffs of 15% would be imposed on U.S. coal and natural gas, while crude oil, agricultural machinery, large cars, and pickup trucks would face an extra 10% tariff.

According to reports, Chinese Ministry of Finance has published a notice against U.S.’s unilateral action declaring that this violated the WTO norms and damaged China-U.S. economic cooperation.

Feb. 3, 1:57 p.m. ESTTrump said tariffs against Canada would be held in abeyance for 30 days after the two countries agreed to strengthen border security. Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Poilievre confirmed the pause and announced the creation of a Canada-U.S. Joint Strike Force to combat organized crime, fentanyl trafficking, and money laundering.

Feb. 3, 3:00 p.m. ESTChina’s UN ambassador, Fu Cong, announced that China would file a lawsuit with the WTO against the U.S. tariffs, claiming that the move violates WTO policies and could lead to further countermeasures from Beijing.

Feb. 3, 10:41 a.m. ESTTrump said in a post on Truth Social that he had “a very friendly conversation” with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, who agreed to deploy 10,000 soldiers to the border. US tariffs on Mexican imports will now be paused for one month.

February 3, 10 a.m. EST The US stocks fell as the markets faced President Donald Trump’s tariffs with major losses in alcoholic beverage companies, cryptocurrency firms, automakers and tech giants Apple and Nvidia among others.

Feb. 3, 6:30 a.m. ESTThe dollar index skyrocketed to a two-year high and the cryptocurrency market has taken a huge blow. Bitcoin lost 3.6% to $95,509 whereas Ether fell sharply by 15% to $2,610. Trump’s meme cryptocurrency, $TRUMP, plummeted 13.5% in the last 24 hours.

Feb. 2, 1 p.m. ESTThe Canadian government released a list of U.S. imports targeted for 25% retaliatory tariffs, affecting $30 billion worth of goods, including food, plastics, lumber, and appliances.

Feb. 2, 10:30 a.m. ESTHomeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem defended the tariffs, saying that any price increases resulting from them would be caused by other countries, not by Trump’s policies.

Feb. 1Canada and Mexico retaliated with tariffs of their own, while China vowed to challenge the U.S. tariffs at the WTO. Trump was unapologetic, arguing that American companies should produce domestically to avoid paying the tariffs.

Economic Impact and Business ReactionEconomists, meanwhile, forecast that tariffs set by Trump will push average annual taxes for U.S. household up by $830; reduce U.S. economic output by 0.4 percent; and increase overall U.S. taxes by $1.2 trillion over the next decade. Business leaders-the U.S. Chamber of Commerce says so-critically note that these tariffs will result in higher prices and supply chain disruptions.

Global Reactions
Chinese state media condemned the move, threatening with a global trade war. Canadian media urged national unity in light of their economic impact; in certain provinces, importing U.S. liquor has been banned as a retaliatory response to those tariffs.

Markets and Governments Gird for Even Greater Long-term Implications from the sweeping tariffs laid down.

Congolese Military Fights to Repute Rwanda-Supported M23 Rebels in Devastating War

Congolese Military Fights to Repute Rwanda-Supported M23 Rebels in Devastating War

Published: Bouncer News | By Abdul Jabbar

A severely weakened Congolese military is being put to an extremely difficult test as Rwanda-backed M23 rebels mount a quick thrust into South Kivu province. Violence continues to rack up the body count, leaving an estimated 700 dead in this week, according to United Nations reports. The crisis has escalated to another regional airport in this already devastated region.

The Congolese army made strategic gains on Saturday, retaking the villages of Sanzi, Muganzo, and Mukwidja in South Kivu’s Kalehe territory. Those areas had fallen under rebel control earlier in the week, two civil society officials said, speaking anonymously due to security concerns.

The Democratic Republic of Congo’s military has been seriously weakened after taking heavy losses, including the loss of Goma, which caused foreign mercenaries to surrender and hundreds of troops to be killed. Goma is a key humanitarian hub central to efforts supporting the more than 6 million displaced people in eastern Congo.

The U.N. peacekeeping chief, Jean-Pierre Lacroix, issued a warning that M23 and Rwandan forces have advanced to within 60 kilometers (37 miles) of South Kivu’s provincial capital, Bukavu. He described the rebel movement as alarmingly fast, stating that their potential capture of an airport a few kilometers away would mark a critical escalation.

U.N. experts have estimated that one of more than 100 militia groups operating in eastern Congo receives backing from a force of roughly 4,000 Rwandan troops. A larger force was needed to topple Goma in 2012, fighting deeply rooted over ethnic grievances; leaders of M23 declared Friday their intent is to march westward toward the capital, Kinshasa – some 1,600 kilometres, or almost 1,000 miles from their current eastern starting point.

U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric said on Friday that an assessment conducted between January 26-30 by the World Health Organization and its partners confirmed the loss of 700 lives and reported 2,800 injuries in Goma and its surrounding areas. The situation continues to deteriorate, with widespread human rights violations recorded.

Jeremy Laurence, a spokesman for the U.N. human rights office, said M23 has committed extrajudicial killings and forced conscription of civilians. Between January 26-28, at least 12 people were executed by the rebels, who have also occupied schools and hospitals, subjecting civilians to forced labor. Meanwhile, Congolese troops have also been accused of committing sexual violence, with allegations of 52 rapes under investigation in South Kivu.

The takeover of Goma has brought humanitarian work to a grinding halt, and critical aid supply routes have been severed. “The humanitarian implications are catastrophic,” Mercy Corps Country Director Rose Tchwenko said. “If violence around Bukavu continues to increase, there’s likely to be further displacement. Communities without access to humanitarian aid are left behind and exposed.”.

As the fighting becomes more intense, concern has grown about the humanitarian impact and the ability of M23 rebels to make further territorial gains. The international community holds its breath as the conflict spills out of control in eastern Congo.

Which Provinces Are Removing U.S. Alcohol from Shelves Over Trump’s Tariffs?

Which Provinces Are Removing U.S. Alcohol from Shelves Over Trump’s Tariffs?

By Abdul Jabbar | Bouncer News

As Canada retaliates against U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs with countermeasures of $155 billion, American-made liquor may be among the first casualties on the shelves of stores. Soon after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s national address outlining Canada’s retaliation, several provincial leaders quickly announced their measures targeting the importation of U.S. liquor.

The premiers of Ontario, British Columbia, Manitoba, and Nova Scotia have each acted with conviction to pull American-made wine, beer, and spirits out of government-run liquor stores. Follow the actions taken by each province:

LCBO (Ontario)

The LCBO is being ordered by Ontario Premier Doug Ford not to sell American alcoholic beverages as of Tuesday, February 4, 2025.

“LCBO currently sells nearly $1 billion worth of American alcohol products annually. That stops now,” Ford declared. “Starting Tuesday, U.S. products will be pulled from LCBO shelves and will no longer be available for purchase by restaurants, bars, and retailers in Ontario.”

The LCBO confirmed compliance with this directive, stating that it will indefinitely suspend all sales of American liquor products both in stores and online, as well as wholesale distribution to other businesses.

British Columbia Liquor Distribution Branch (BCLDB)

British Columbia Premier David Eby announced that the province will halt purchases of U.S. liquor from Republican-led states and remove top-selling American brands from public liquor store shelves.

The BCLDB clarified its approach, stating:

The immediate suspension of new import orders of alcoholic liquors from Republican-controlled states.

Available stock of Jack Daniels, Bacardi Rum, Tito’s Vodka, Jim Beam, and Bulleit Bourbon will no longer be available for wholesale and hospitality orders as well.  
Retail sales for these brands will be closed, and current stock taken out of shelves.
The liquors produced in Democratic-led states will continue to be sold.

Manitoba Liquor and Lotteries (MBLL)

Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew has also banned the sale of American alcohol in the province, aligning with the federal government’s stance against Trump’s tariffs.
“Trump’s tariff tax is an attack on Canadians,” Kinew said. “We stand with the federal government’s response. As of February 4, Manitoba liquor marts will stop selling American alcohol, and no new orders will be placed.

The MBLL would be removing all U.S. alcohol products off its shelves, and Manitoba is urging consumers to buy local and support local breweries and distilleries.

Québec Liquor Board (SAQ)

Quebec has no specific measures as of yet concerning U.S. liquor imports. Premier François Legault has suggested that some American goods will see counter-tariffs, and it is uncertain if alcohol would be included among them.

An SAQ spokesperson said Monday nothing has been transmitted so far from the provincial government on order to eliminate U.S. alcohol off store shelves.

Nova Scotia Liquor Commission (NSLC)

Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston stated that American alcohol would no longer be sold in provincial liquor stores starting February 4, 2025.

In a statement, the NSLC said: “Following the Province’s announcement, we will halt all sales of U.S. alcohol, removing these products from our shelves and ceasing future orders.”

As Canada escalates its trade response to U.S. tariffs, American alcohol brands are among the first to be affected. Consumers in several provinces will soon see a shift toward locally produced options as provincial liquor boards implement these bans. The coming weeks will reveal whether additional provinces join this growing movement against U.S. imports.

B.C. Premier Takes Stand Against U.S. Tariffs, Orders Halt on American Liquor Purchases

B.C. Premier Takes Stand Against U.S. Tariffs, Orders Halt on American Liquor Purchases

By Abdul Jabbar | Bouncer News

British Columbia Premier David Eby has taken a strong stand against the recent move by the U.S. government to impose a 25 per cent tariff on Canadian goods, ordering the BC Liquor Distribution Branch to stop purchasing American liquor.

Speaking at a press conference in Vancouver, Eby condemned the tariffs announced by U.S. President Donald Trump, saying they are “a complete betrayal” of the longstanding economic relationship between Canada and the United States.

“This is an economic assault on a trusted ally and friend,” Eby declared. “We will not stand idly by as our province and our industries are unfairly targeted.

The imposition of new tariffs, ranging from the 25 per cent duty on various Canadian exports to a 10 per cent tariff on energy products, will take effect on Tuesday. In response, Eby has called for immediate countermeasures, which include halting the purchase of American liquor from Republican-led states and removing existing stock from store shelves.

In addition, Eby has ordered provincial agencies, such as BC Hydro, ICBC, and health authorities, to prefer Canadian goods and services over imported American ones.

The provincial government has also fast-tracked the approvals of ten private-sector projects worth $20 billion in mining, renewable energy, and natural gas production. This is expected to add about 6,000 jobs in northern and rural communities.

Eby also tackled the issue of illicit drug trafficking, a cause cited for applying the tariffs. Admitting that fentanyl indeed wreaks havoc in both Canada and the United States, he maintained that this was not a reason to impose tariffs.

We have the same goal in terms of combating organized crime and the flow of illicit drugs,” he said. “If President Trump is serious about working together on this issue, we are open to dialogue. But these tariffs do nothing to solve the problem.

According to a statement from the Office of the Premier, wood, pulp and paper, metallic minerals, and energy products make up almost 67 per cent of B.C.’s exports to the U.S. The forestry sector, already reeling from softwood lumber duties and mill closures, is expected to be hit particularly hard by the new tariffs.

The BC Council of Forest Industries had warned that new trade restrictions might lead to job losses and instability in the local economies of many communities that have been dependent on the industry.
Eby continued to be stubborn, stating that B.C. has diversified the economy and brought down its dependency on U.S. trade.

“Even if these tariffs are eventually lifted, our relationship with the U.S. will never return to what it was before,” he stated. “British Columbia must continue forging new trade partnerships and expanding its global economic network.”

Eby concluded with a message of resilience and unity: “As British Columbians and Canadians, we will stand together against this unfair attack and protect our economic future.”

No Economic Reason: Alberta Premier Denounces U.S. Tariff on Canadian Oil

No Economic Reason: Alberta Premier Denounces U.S. Tariff on Canadian Oil

Author: Abdul Jabbar

Publisher: Bouncer News

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has denounced the new U.S. tariffs on Canadian goods, promising to work to reverse President Donald Trump’s move. In a X (formerly Twitter) post on Saturday, Smith decried the U.S. administration’s move to impose a 10% tariff on Canadian energy products and a 25% tariff on all other Canadian products.

Smith warned that this move would not only harm Canada but also harm the United States negatively by destroying the economic relationship between the two nations. She emphasized Alberta’s commitment to working with the federal government and other provinces to create a proportionate response to these tariffs.

“Alberta will use every available resource to persuade the U.S. president, Congress, and American people to abandon this self-destructive policy,” Smith said.

Alberta’s Campaign and Economic Contributions

Smith attributed the reduced 10% tariff on Canadian oil to the persistent lobbying of Alberta’s government and its oil industry. She highlighted Alberta’s contribution to assisting the U.S. economy by supplying crude oil for refining and processing in American manufacturing.

“It is worth mentioning that apart from energy exports, the U.S. actually benefits more from trade with Canada than vice versa,” Smith said. “Canada purchases more American goods than any other country—more than the U.K., France, Germany, Italy, and Vietnam combined. So, there is no economic reason to place tariffs on Canadian goods.”

Smith again committed Alberta to continuing diplomatic action in the U.S. to pressure the administration to lift these tariffs. She added that American consumers will see the direct effect of these policies, specifically higher gasoline prices.

Strategic Reaction to Tariffs

The premier recommended Canada counter U.S. tariffs by slapping import duties on American goods easily supplied by other nations. That way, she said, maximum economic pressure would be brought to bear on the U.S. and minimal financial cost would be imposed on Canadian consumers.

Furthermore, Smith said, any revenue generated by retaliatory tariffs should be directed towards helping Canadians most hurt by the trade standoff. But she rejected any policy that could hurt Canadian businesses, such as American banned exports or export tariffs on Canadian exports.

“Such retaliatory measures would hurt more Canadians than Americans,” she said. “Canada now must act vigorously to diversify its trade partners and break free of its single-market dependence.”

Tariff Impact on Alberta and American Consumers

Gary Mar, president and CEO of the Canada West Foundation, also expressed similar concerns, claiming tariffs on Canadian oil would add to the price of fuel for American consumers. Canada provides roughly 60% of U.S. crude oil imports, and Mar warned the tariffs would usher in unavoidable price hikes at the gas pump.

“There is no evading higher gasoline prices in the U.S. when tariffs are imposed on Canadian oil,” Mar explained. “This action is the antithesis of Trump’s vow to reduce fuel costs, and it could eventually turn out to be political poison.”

Mar foresees that when gas prices rise, American voters may rethink their support for Trump’s trade policies. He also suggested that the president’s action may be part of a larger strategy to revive the Keystone XL pipeline project, which requires the cooperation of Canada.

“The pipeline from Hardisty, Alberta, to the Montana border already exists,” Mar noted. “If Trump wants to make the U.S. an energy superpower, he can’t do it without Canadian oil and gas.”

Future Trade Strategies for Canada

Mar warned against drastic countermeasures such as an embargo on oil exports to the U.S., saying that doing so would shift public anger from Trump’s policies to Canada. Instead, he urged the Canadian government to adopt a measured and tactical response to the tariffs.

In the long term, Mar noted that Canada needs to diversify its reliance on the U.S. and seek alternative markets for its oil and gas exports. The Calgary Chamber of Commerce also weighed in, urging the federal government to place more emphasis on diplomacy than on swift retaliation.

“Retaliatory tariffs should be a last resort, especially given that American consumers will already be feeling the effects of Trump’s trade policies,” the chamber said. “Gas prices in the U.S. could increase by as much as 30 cents per gallon, affecting millions of American jobs that are linked to trade with Canada.”

Smith concluded by urging the expansion of Canada’s energy infrastructure, including the construction of new pipelines to the east and west coasts. She noted that the removal of regulatory barriers and the expansion of interprovincial trade would make the country more economically resilient.

“Alberta stands ready to assist in a unified national effort to defend our economic interests,” stated Smith. “This is a moment that demands leadership and judicious strategy to protect our prosperity.”