Doug Ford Takes His Ontario Election Campaign to Washington, D.C.

Doug Ford Takes His Ontario Election Campaign to Washington, D.C.

Publisher: Bouncer News
Author: Abdul Jabbar

Doug Ford’s Campaign Strategy Crosses Borders

Doug Ford, the Premier of Ontario, took an unconventional step in his re-election campaign by traveling to Washington, D.C., where he engaged with influential U.S. business and political figures. On Tuesday morning, Ford addressed the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, one of the most powerful lobbying organizations in the country, and later met with key Republican lawmakers from border states, including a Michigan congresswoman and a North Dakota senator.

Ford’s trip, which aligns with his campaign narrative of needing a strong mandate to tackle trade issues and respond to U.S. policies, raises questions about its timing. While he argues that engaging with U.S. officials is essential for Ontario’s economic interests, critics suggest this visit is a strategic move to bolster his election bid. The Progressive Conservative Party has funded Ford’s travel expenses, but there is debate over whether taxpayers are covering any additional costs.

Political and Media Scrutiny

The opposition has been vocal about Ford’s decision to campaign internationally, suggesting it reflects an opportunistic election strategy. Given that Ford has justified calling this early election as a necessity to strengthen Ontario’s stance against trade tariffs and Donald Trump’s policies, some find it contradictory that he is focusing efforts outside Ontario during the campaign period.

Political analyst Anthony Furey pointed out that while Ford’s international engagement may seem unusual, it also highlights the reality of his role as Premier. “You cannot address trade and economic issues solely by knocking on doors in Ontario ridings,” he said. Ford’s media exposure in Washington, including appearances on major U.S. networks like CNN and Fox News, also differentiates his campaign from that of his rivals, who lack access to such international platforms.

Meanwhile, Queen’s Park reporters traveled to Washington to cover the trip, indicating the significance of Ford’s visit. Some noted that the event at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce had a largely Canadian audience, leading to speculation about whether the trip was more about optics than substantive policy discussions. Nevertheless, Ford and his cabinet ministers reportedly maintained a packed schedule, engaging in discussions with policymakers throughout their visit.

Public and Electoral Impact

Despite criticisms, Ford’s trip does not appear to be harming his re-election prospects. His supporters view the visit as a demonstration of leadership in navigating Ontario’s economic future. However, whether this move will translate into electoral success remains to be seen. With Ontario’s opposition parties struggling to shift the narrative back to domestic concerns, Ford appears to be setting the agenda, making this campaign strategy a high-risk, high-reward move.

As Ontario voters prepare to head to the polls, Ford’s ability to balance his role as Premier with his campaign efforts will remain under scrutiny. Whether his trip to Washington strengthens his position or backfires politically will soon be determined by the electorate.

1 Dead in Surrey Police Shooting Following Reports of Armed Individual in Schoolyard

1 Dead in Surrey Police Shooting Following Reports of Armed Individual in Schoolyard

By Abdul Jabbar | Bouncer News

Surrey, B.C. — The Independent Investigations Office (IIO) of British Columbia is looking into a fatal police shooting that occurred on Sunday in the Clayton Heights neighborhood of Surrey. One person was shot and killed after officers responded to reports of an armed individual in a schoolyard.

According to the B.C. RCMP, officers were dispatched around 2:40 p.m. PT to a schoolyard located in the 7000 block of 188 Street following reports of a distressed person with a firearm. Authorities say the situation escalated near the intersection of 185 Street and 70 Avenue, where there was an “interaction” between police and the individual. During this encounter, officers opened fire, fatally striking the person, who was pronounced dead at the scene.

The identity and age of the deceased have not been disclosed.

Jessica Berglund, the IIO’s chief civilian director, stated, “We are in the preliminary stages of the investigation. Our team is actively interviewing witnesses, canvassing the neighborhood, and collecting any physical evidence related to the incident.”

The emergency health services that were close were on the scene immediately following the shooting, and they were not able to salvage the victim. The IIO is tasked with determining if the actions taken by the officers are “necessary, reasonable, and proportionate under the circumstances.”
The IIO investigates any cases involving police officers that end up in serious injury or death; this can occur with or without allegations of misconduct.

“We understand the community’s concerns and the public’s interest in this case. We will work diligently to conduct a thorough investigation and provide timely updates as more information becomes available,” Berglund added.

Clarification:A previous version of this report incorrectly stated that the shooting took place outside an elementary school. The IIO has since clarified that while police were initially called to a schoolyard, the fatal encounter occurred several blocks away at 70 Avenue and 185 Street.

Published: February 10, 2025, 1:59 PM PST

Russia Holy Ghost Parish Priest Escapes Knife Attack During Sunday Mass; Suspect Arrested

Russia Holy Ghost Parish Priest Escapes Knife Attack During Sunday Mass; Suspect Arrested

Published on Bouncer News | By Abdul Jabbar

A shocking incident unfolded during Sunday mass at Holy Ghost Parish in Winnipeg, where a Catholic priest narrowly escaped a knife attack. The event, captured on a 50-second livestream video, left parishioners stunned but fortunately resulted in no injuries.

The priest, dressed in deep-green vestments, was leading prayers in Polish as he approached the altar. Suddenly, a bald man wearing a bright yellow jacket and sneakers advanced towards him, brandishing a knife. The attacker lunged without warning, prompting the priest to scream and flee the immediate area. In a disturbing turn, the assailant stabbed the altar table before calmly sitting down.

Several parishioners, including an off-duty RCMP officer, quickly intervened, detaining the suspect until police arrived. Authorities identified the suspect as 50-year-old Pawel Olownia of Winnipeg. He has been charged with assault with a weapon, possession of a weapon, and disturbing a religious gathering. Olownia remains in custody.

Winnipeg Police Service spokeswoman Const. Dani McKinnon described the attack as “extremely unexpected,” noting that such violent acts within places of worship are rare in the city. “The suspect does not appear to have any connection to the church or its congregation,” McKinnon stated. “The motive remains unclear and may only become evident during court proceedings.”

Olownia has a criminal history, including a 2018 conviction for assaulting a peace officer with a weapon, which resulted in an 11-month jail sentence. His record also includes charges of assault, theft, uttering threats, and impaired driving.

Church leaders across Winnipeg have expressed growing concerns over rising incidents of crime and vandalism targeting places of worship. Ahmed Jibo, pastor of Pilgrim Baptist Church, emphasized the need for increased vigilance. “We must learn from this incident and enhance safety measures for our congregations,” he said.

Erik Parker, pastor of Sherwood Park Lutheran Church, highlighted that while such incidents are rare, they serve as a wake-up call. “Security discussions are necessary, but we must balance safety with maintaining an open, welcoming environment for worshippers,” Parker remarked.

The Archdiocese of Winnipeg expressed gratitude that no one was harmed and is awaiting judicial proceedings for further clarity on the case. The chilling event serves as a stark reminder of the unpredictable nature of such attacks and the importance of community awareness and preparedness in ensuring the safety of worship spaces.

Vance and Musk Question Judicial Authority as Legal Hurdles Sidetrack Trump's Agenda

Vance and Musk Question Judicial Authority as Legal Hurdles Sidetrack Trump’s Agenda

Author: Abdul Jabbar | Publisher: Bouncer News

Top officials within the Trump administration, including Vice President JD Vance and billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, are openly questioning the authority of the judiciary as legal challenges threaten to derail key components of President Donald Trump’s ambitious agenda.

Both Vance and Musk have issued blistering criticisms since a federal judge blocked Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency from access to sensitive records in the U.S. Treasury Department over the past 24 hours. They attacked not just the ruling, but also what they said about the legitimacy of judicial oversight—that bedrock underpinning America’s democratic system, based on the separation of powers.

“If a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal. If a judge tried to command the attorney general in how to use her discretion as a prosecutor, that’s also illegal. Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” Vance posted on X (formerly Twitter) early Sunday.

Echoing Vance’s sentiments, Musk took to social media to launch a direct attack on the judge, calling for immediate impeachment. “A corrupt judge protecting corruption. He needs to be impeached NOW!” Musk wrote, signaling his frustration with the ruling that temporarily bars his team from accessing a Treasury system containing sensitive data such as Social Security numbers and bank account details of millions of Americans.

Musk, appointed by Trump to spearhead efforts in rooting out governmental inefficiencies, defended his team’s actions, asserting they are merely following the president’s directive to identify waste and abuse within federal systems. Some of Musk’s supporters even suggested defying the court order outright, prompting debates about the limits of executive power.

Stephen Miller, Deputy White House Chief of Staff, further escalated tensions by framing the ruling as an existential threat to democracy. “This is an assault on the very idea of democracy itself,” Miller declared on Fox News, criticizing what he described as an “unelected shadow force” within the government.

The judicial fightback against the broader administration moves to downsize federal agencies, make sweeping workforce cuts, and dismantle bureaucratic structures has been fierce. Several of Trump’s executive orders have been halted through court decisions, including efforts to end birthright citizenship, impose mass buyouts of federal employees, place thousands of USAID employees on administrative leave, and more.

The latest legal clash stems from a preliminary injunction issued by U.S. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer after 19 Democratic attorneys general sued the administration. The lawsuit alleges that Musk’s team accessed Treasury Department systems unlawfully, violating federal statutes designed to protect citizens’ personal and financial information.

Speaking aboard Air Force One en route to the Super Bowl, Trump voiced his frustration. “We’re very disappointed with judges making such rulings. No judge should frankly be allowed to make that kind of decision,” he remarked.

The Democrats responded with alarm, framing the defiance of the administration of judicial authority as a constitutional crisis. Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut wrote, “This is the most serious constitutional crisis since Watergate. Our democracy is at risk.” He cautioned against waiting for the courts to intervene, stressing that there needed to be bipartisan opposition.

Despite the rising controversy, the Republican leaders remain behind Trump. Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio reacted to the intervention of the court by saying that the president needs to be given the space to implement his policies. “We knew the Democrats would challenge us like this. We’ll argue it in court, but the president should be able to implement his agenda,” Jordan said on CNN.

As the legal battles intensify, a pivotal hearing is scheduled for February 14, setting the stage for what could be a defining moment in the ongoing clash between the executive branch and the judiciary.

Washington's View on Annexing Canada: A Joke or Something More?

Washington’s View on Annexing Canada: A Joke or Something More?

Author: Abdul Jabbar | Publisher: Bouncer News

In normal times, the notion of a G7 and NATO leader accusing a U.S. president of having an intention to annex Canada would headline the news, prompting global debate. But these are far from normal times.

Former President Donald Trump’s casual remarks about annexing Canada have been largely dismissed in Washington as either a joke or a strategic negotiation tactic. The prevailing sentiment among political circles is disbelief—surely, he can’t be serious. Right? Right?

Fuel was added to the fire by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau when he was caught saying that Trump, in fact, considered taking over Canada. The information came from a cryptic phone call that Trump made with an “interesting” 1908 treaty that outlines the Canada-U.S. boundary.

Oddly, major US media outlets seem to have had little interest. The New York Times buried it deep within its homepage, the Wall Street Journal below routine economic updates, and the Washington Post didn’t bother to feature it at all. Even recent congressional hearings focusing on U.S.-Canada trade and mineral relations did not mention it.

At one such hearing, Democrat Rep. Seth Magaziner sarcastically referenced Trump’s self-proclaimed “stable genius” status, mocking his approach to Canada, especially considering the nation’s vital resources like aluminum, lithium, and cobalt.

Republican Sen. Ted Cruz brushed off the annexation talk on his podcast, labeling it an “epic troll” aimed at provoking Trudeau. The logistical and political barriers to such a move are staggering. U.S. public opinion polls suggest Canadian statehood is wildly unpopular, and getting such a proposal through Congress would be a political minefield. It would require lawmakers to cede significant power, potentially adding dozens of new House seats and several Senate seats for Canadian regions.

George Laws Garcia, executive director of the Puerto Rico Statehood Council, noted, “Even if there were enough supporters in Congress, the actual votes would be a political minefield.”

Moreover, time isn’t on Trump’s side. His party’s slim House majority is at risk in the upcoming midterms. Pushing unpopular ideas like annexing Canada could accelerate potential losses.

However, there are hints that Trump might be more serious than people think. He’s mentioned territorial expansion multiple times, including in his inaugural address, and has floated similar ideas about Panama, Greenland, and even Gaza. His administration’s focus on real estate developments in geopolitically sensitive areas adds to the intrigue.

Daniel Immerwahr, a Northwestern University professor and author of How to Hide an Empire, thinks that Trump relishes in the shock value of outrageous statements and may be doing so as leverage in trade deals or foreign policy negotiations. But he doesn’t rule out entirely the possibility of actual imperial ambitions.

Stephen Wertheim from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace suggests that Trump’s rhetoric echoes the 19th-century Monroe Doctrine, where U.S. territorial expansion was a clear goal. He warns that using annexation threats as a negotiation tactic puts the U.S. in “uncharted territory.”

While this sounds very far-fetched, it does go to show how strange modern politics could be. Whether it be a joke, a ploy, or something more, the conversation itself forms a strange chapter in U.S.-Canada relations.

Trump to Announce 25% Tariffs on Steel and Aluminum, Including Canada

Trump to Announce 25% Tariffs on Steel and Aluminum, Including Canada

By Abdul Jabbar | Bouncer News

In a shocking twist, U.S. President Donald Trump has vowed to impose 25% tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports, including those from Canada and Mexico. He will make the official announcement on Monday, he revealed during a press conference aboard Air Force One while en route to New Orleans to attend the Super Bowl between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Philadelphia Eagles.

This is a shift in trade policy, especially by Canada, whose exemption was based on a then-newly minted tariffs first imposed in March 2018. Back then, Trump insisted that the same 25 percent steel and 10 percent aluminum tariffs were issued under the “national security clause.” Canada remained exempt until it was finally instituted on May 31, 2018. In response to the U.S. move, Canada placed matching counter-tariffs on such American products like Florida orange juice.

The trade tensions eased nearly a year later when, on May 17, 2019, the U.S. and Canada reached an agreement to prevent surges in steel and aluminum imports, effectively ending the dispute. However, Trump’s latest announcement threatens to reignite these tensions.

In an interview aired on Fox News before the Super Bowl, Trump made headlines with his provocative statement suggesting that Canada would be “much better off” as the 51st state of the U.S. He claimed that the U.S. loses $200 billion annually to Canada, although this figure is not supported by official trade statistics. According to Statistics Canada, the country’s trade surplus with the U.S. was $94.4 billion in 2023, primarily driven by oil exports.

Trump’s comments were a response to a question from Fox News anchor Bret Baier, who referenced Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s remarks to business leaders, acknowledging that Trump’s statehood comments might not be a joke. Trudeau’s candid remarks were inadvertently broadcast during a closed-door session at a Canada-U.S. economic summit in Toronto.

Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet also weighed in, criticizing Trump’s tariff plans via social media. Blanchet pointed out that the U.S. cannot produce enough aluminum domestically to replace imports from Quebec, warning that the tariffs could trigger significant inflation in key American industries.

Trump initially cited border security concerns, including issues related to fentanyl trafficking and illegal immigration, as reasons for considering tariffs on Canadian products. Despite this, his rhetoric has increasingly focused on trade imbalances and the perceived lack of American banking presence in Canada.

As of February 3, Canada and Mexico secured temporary 30-day reprieves from the new tariffs after direct discussions between Trump, Trudeau, and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. Canada has committed $1.3 billion towards enhanced border security measures, including aerial patrols and the appointment of a “fentanyl czar” to coordinate efforts with U.S. agencies in combating the opioid crisis.

With Trump’s formal tariff announcement looming, the future of North American trade relations hangs in the balance, raising concerns among industry leaders and policymakers on both sides of the border.

Rubio Embarks on Central America Tour with Immigration and Panama Canal at Forefront

Rubio Embarks on Central America Tour with Immigration and Panama Canal at Forefront

Publisher: Bouncer New | Author: Abdul Jabbar

Secretary of State Marco Rubio is going to embark on his first foreign travel this weekend as he heads for Central America with two themes firmly topping his agenda, including curbing illegal immigration and reasserting control for the United States at the Panama Canal, an action that has already drawn criticism from the region.

This was Central America for Rubio, which deviates from the norm set by previous U.S. secretaries of state when they opted to visit Europe or Asia first. It also represents a combination of personal affinity toward the region-the first Hispanic ever to serve in this position-and the strategy by the Trump administration to place the highest foreign policy priorities within the Western Hemisphere.

“It’s no coincidence that my first trip abroad as secretary of state will be within the hemisphere,” Rubio wrote in an op-ed published in The Wall Street Journal on Friday.

Among his agenda, mass migration and drug trafficking will take center stage for Rubio. Still, the visit also aims to challenge China’s growing presence in Latin America, especially with regard to infrastructure spending in areas surrounding the Panama Canal. The U.S. built the canal but relinquished it to Panama in 1999. Even with intense objections from Panamanian leaders, the Trump administration has been very vocal about retaking control of the critical trade artery.

Mass migration, drug smuggling, and the policies of nations such as Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela have created instability, Rubio wrote in his Journal piece. “At the same time, the Chinese Communist Party is using economic and diplomatic influence—especially at the Panama Canal—to undermine U.S. interests and turn sovereign nations into dependent states.”

His first destination on his five-nation tour is Panama, where President José Raúl Mulino has categorically rejected any idea of returning control of the canal to the United States. He says the discussions will be about issues of mutual concern, like migration and drug trafficking.

“The canal is Panamanian. There is no room for negotiation on this matter,” Mulino said on Thursday.

But on this, Rubio is undeterred. Speaking with SiriusXM’s Megyn Kelly, he reiterated that President Trump believes it’s a national security issue because of the increasing Chinese presence in the region. “The president has made it clear that he wants to oversee the canal once again. While the Panamanians are opposed, that stance won’t change our concerns,” Rubio said.

China’s influence over key port facilities at both ends of the canal has been a cause for concern in Washington because if Beijing were to decide to disrupt trade flows, then this would clearly breach the treaty signed in 1977 under which former President Jimmy Carter had agreed to hand over the Panama Canal.

Despite Mulino’s tough talk, analysts see potential for a settlement, at least regarding Hong Kong-based Hutchison Ports, to which was extended a 25-year concession on a no-bid basis. An audit on the legality of that extension has been ordered; rebidding then might let the concession fall to an American or European operator, but that likely would not fulfill Trump’s general demands.

Trump is applying pressure where there may already be an opening,” said Ryan Berg, director of the Americas Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C. “The real question is whether his administration is willing to accept a middle-ground solution or if full control is the ultimate goal.

He is scheduled to visit El Salvador, Costa Rica, Guatemala and the Dominican Republic following Panama as part of the trip. During his visit coincides with resumed U.S. visa processing, after a four-week suspension following a temporary blockade imposed by Colombia over the unwillingness of their government to allow deportation of national back to U.S. end.

Unlike previous secretaries of state who often travel with aid commitments and cooperation initiatives, Rubio’s trip is expected to feature limited new assistance. This is because of Trump’s freeze on foreign aid pending a review of all U.S. assistance programs. Although some critical humanitarian programs have been exempted, waivers for aid packages in Panama, Costa Rica, and the Dominican Republic are still under evaluation.

One notable exception is Haiti, where the State Department has already approved $41 million to support an international peacekeeping mission. Although Rubio will not be visiting Haiti, his discussions with regional leaders are expected to touch on broader U.S. efforts to maintain stability in the region.

Immigration, security, and geopolitical influence are all at stake in Rubio’s tour, which is a critical test for the Trump administration’s foreign policy in Latin America. The results of his negotiations, especially on the Panama Canal, will shape U.S.-Central America relations for years to come.

Hazardous Situations on Highway 1 Through Fraser Valley Prompt Temporary Closures

Hazardous Situations on Highway 1 Through Fraser Valley Prompt Temporary Closures

Bouncer News – B.C. highway officials are telling drivers to slow down and drive with extreme caution on Highway 1 through Langley and into the Fraser Valley, where the conditions are deemed hazardous enough that the highway will be temporarily shut down.

BC Highway Patrol Cpl. Michael McLaughlin said hazardous weather may cause authorities to close sections of the highway in both directions for safety reasons.

“The initial reports of icy conditions came from the stretch between 216th and 264th streets, but the risk extends along Highway 1 from Whistler to Hope,” McLaughlin noted.

Drivers are advised to avoid non-essential travel, leave earlier than usual for their trips, and make sure their vehicles are prepared for winter driving.

The low-pressure system located southwest of Vancouver Island has been driving this weather pattern, sending bands of snow spiraling across the South Coast, Global BC meteorologist Mark Madryga said.

The first flakes of snow appeared early on Saturday, and heavier snowfall developed overnight into Sunday, leaving more than 10 centimeters in some parts of the central Fraser Valley.

Another plus to watch for is that howling Arctic winds should continue to blow over the Fraser Valley, Howe Sound, and other coastal inlets until at least Monday and even into Tuesday, further badging driving dangers.

Motorists need to stay current on road conditions and be prepared for possible disruptions as winter weather persists in the region.

Publisher: Bouncer News
Author: Abdul Jabbar

https://theinscribermag.com/

Trump Tariffs Live Updates: 10 Percent Tariffs on China Take Hold as Beijing Detailed Plan for Reprisals

Published by Abdul Jabbar | Bouncer News

Feb. 4, 1:00 a.m. ESTPresident Donald Trump’s sweeping 10% tariffs on imports from China came into effect at midnight Tuesday, prompting retaliatory levies by Beijing. The Chinese government announced that starting February 10, additional tariffs of 15% would be imposed on U.S. coal and natural gas, while crude oil, agricultural machinery, large cars, and pickup trucks would face an extra 10% tariff.

According to reports, Chinese Ministry of Finance has published a notice against U.S.’s unilateral action declaring that this violated the WTO norms and damaged China-U.S. economic cooperation.

Feb. 3, 1:57 p.m. ESTTrump said tariffs against Canada would be held in abeyance for 30 days after the two countries agreed to strengthen border security. Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Poilievre confirmed the pause and announced the creation of a Canada-U.S. Joint Strike Force to combat organized crime, fentanyl trafficking, and money laundering.

Feb. 3, 3:00 p.m. ESTChina’s UN ambassador, Fu Cong, announced that China would file a lawsuit with the WTO against the U.S. tariffs, claiming that the move violates WTO policies and could lead to further countermeasures from Beijing.

Feb. 3, 10:41 a.m. ESTTrump said in a post on Truth Social that he had “a very friendly conversation” with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, who agreed to deploy 10,000 soldiers to the border. US tariffs on Mexican imports will now be paused for one month.

February 3, 10 a.m. EST The US stocks fell as the markets faced President Donald Trump’s tariffs with major losses in alcoholic beverage companies, cryptocurrency firms, automakers and tech giants Apple and Nvidia among others.

Feb. 3, 6:30 a.m. ESTThe dollar index skyrocketed to a two-year high and the cryptocurrency market has taken a huge blow. Bitcoin lost 3.6% to $95,509 whereas Ether fell sharply by 15% to $2,610. Trump’s meme cryptocurrency, $TRUMP, plummeted 13.5% in the last 24 hours.

Feb. 2, 1 p.m. ESTThe Canadian government released a list of U.S. imports targeted for 25% retaliatory tariffs, affecting $30 billion worth of goods, including food, plastics, lumber, and appliances.

Feb. 2, 10:30 a.m. ESTHomeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem defended the tariffs, saying that any price increases resulting from them would be caused by other countries, not by Trump’s policies.

Feb. 1Canada and Mexico retaliated with tariffs of their own, while China vowed to challenge the U.S. tariffs at the WTO. Trump was unapologetic, arguing that American companies should produce domestically to avoid paying the tariffs.

Economic Impact and Business ReactionEconomists, meanwhile, forecast that tariffs set by Trump will push average annual taxes for U.S. household up by $830; reduce U.S. economic output by 0.4 percent; and increase overall U.S. taxes by $1.2 trillion over the next decade. Business leaders-the U.S. Chamber of Commerce says so-critically note that these tariffs will result in higher prices and supply chain disruptions.

Global Reactions
Chinese state media condemned the move, threatening with a global trade war. Canadian media urged national unity in light of their economic impact; in certain provinces, importing U.S. liquor has been banned as a retaliatory response to those tariffs.

Markets and Governments Gird for Even Greater Long-term Implications from the sweeping tariffs laid down.

Congolese Military Fights to Repute Rwanda-Supported M23 Rebels in Devastating War

Congolese Military Fights to Repute Rwanda-Supported M23 Rebels in Devastating War

Published: Bouncer News | By Abdul Jabbar

A severely weakened Congolese military is being put to an extremely difficult test as Rwanda-backed M23 rebels mount a quick thrust into South Kivu province. Violence continues to rack up the body count, leaving an estimated 700 dead in this week, according to United Nations reports. The crisis has escalated to another regional airport in this already devastated region.

The Congolese army made strategic gains on Saturday, retaking the villages of Sanzi, Muganzo, and Mukwidja in South Kivu’s Kalehe territory. Those areas had fallen under rebel control earlier in the week, two civil society officials said, speaking anonymously due to security concerns.

The Democratic Republic of Congo’s military has been seriously weakened after taking heavy losses, including the loss of Goma, which caused foreign mercenaries to surrender and hundreds of troops to be killed. Goma is a key humanitarian hub central to efforts supporting the more than 6 million displaced people in eastern Congo.

The U.N. peacekeeping chief, Jean-Pierre Lacroix, issued a warning that M23 and Rwandan forces have advanced to within 60 kilometers (37 miles) of South Kivu’s provincial capital, Bukavu. He described the rebel movement as alarmingly fast, stating that their potential capture of an airport a few kilometers away would mark a critical escalation.

U.N. experts have estimated that one of more than 100 militia groups operating in eastern Congo receives backing from a force of roughly 4,000 Rwandan troops. A larger force was needed to topple Goma in 2012, fighting deeply rooted over ethnic grievances; leaders of M23 declared Friday their intent is to march westward toward the capital, Kinshasa – some 1,600 kilometres, or almost 1,000 miles from their current eastern starting point.

U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric said on Friday that an assessment conducted between January 26-30 by the World Health Organization and its partners confirmed the loss of 700 lives and reported 2,800 injuries in Goma and its surrounding areas. The situation continues to deteriorate, with widespread human rights violations recorded.

Jeremy Laurence, a spokesman for the U.N. human rights office, said M23 has committed extrajudicial killings and forced conscription of civilians. Between January 26-28, at least 12 people were executed by the rebels, who have also occupied schools and hospitals, subjecting civilians to forced labor. Meanwhile, Congolese troops have also been accused of committing sexual violence, with allegations of 52 rapes under investigation in South Kivu.

The takeover of Goma has brought humanitarian work to a grinding halt, and critical aid supply routes have been severed. “The humanitarian implications are catastrophic,” Mercy Corps Country Director Rose Tchwenko said. “If violence around Bukavu continues to increase, there’s likely to be further displacement. Communities without access to humanitarian aid are left behind and exposed.”.

As the fighting becomes more intense, concern has grown about the humanitarian impact and the ability of M23 rebels to make further territorial gains. The international community holds its breath as the conflict spills out of control in eastern Congo.